Software Development · Project-Based Training

Full-Stack Development

Proposed course for learners building end-to-end web applications. Does not assume prior professional experience; programming fundamentals are included where needed.

  • Git
  • Frontend
  • Backend APIs
  • Databases
  • Authentication basics
  • Testing
Register interestAll training programs

This is fee-based Project-Based Training — not a paid internship. Registering interest is not enrollment and does not collect payment. Fee details will be shared before enrollment.

Overview

Program facts

Duration
2 months
Level
Beginner to intermediate
Weekly commitment
Approximately 10–15 hours per week (subject to final schedule)
Delivery
Online
Availability
Coming soon — interest registration available
Fee
Fee details will be shared before enrollment
Mentor / supervisor
Instructor or delivery owner assigned before open enrollment.
Delivery owner
Assigned before enrollment opens
Certificate policy
Certificate policy confirmed at enrollment open.
Fit

Audience, prerequisites, and selection

Audience

  • Beginners with motivation to learn by building
  • Developers expanding into full-stack work

Prerequisites

  • Computer literacy and consistent weekly availability
  • No prior professional experience required
Curriculum

Curriculum

Curriculum status: forthcoming / proposed. Topics below are indicative and not a finalized enrollment curriculum until marked approved.

  • Programming fundamentalsfoundational
  • Git and version controlfoundational
  • Frontend developmentfoundational
  • Backend APIsfoundational
  • Databasesfoundational
  • Authentication basicsadvanced
  • Testing and documentationadvanced
Outcomes

Learning outcomes

  • Build and explain a small full-stack application
  • Use Git effectively for iterative work
Project

Project specification

Build and explain a small full-stack application with authentication, persistence, validation, and tests.

Problem statement · Illustrative
A learner needs one end-to-end web application that proves they can connect interface, API, data, and tests.
Primary user workflow · Illustrative
Sign in → complete the primary create/read workflow → see persisted results → exercise a failing validation path.
Functional scope · Illustrative
Programming fundamentals as needed, Git, frontend, backend API, database, authentication basics, testing, and documentation.
Technical components · Illustrative
UI, API, database schema, auth, validation, and automated tests for critical paths.
Data requirements · Illustrative
Learner-owned sample data only.
Testing expectations · Illustrative
Critical path tests plus at least one invalid-input rejection.
Known limitations · Illustrative
Scoped MVP. Not a claim of professional production experience or employment readiness by itself.
What counts as completion · Illustrative
Working full-stack MVP, Git history of iterative work, tests, docs, and a demonstration explaining architecture.

Examples

  • Full-stack app with auth, database, API validation, and tests

Deliverables

  • Working full-stack MVP
  • Tests for critical flows
  • Technical documentation

Example or assigned project work—not a published student achievement or employment guarantee. Student work is not assumed for commercial use without appropriate agreements. Sections marked illustrative are representative examples, not a fixed commercial brief.

Assessment

Evaluation criteria

How work is reviewed — clarity of decisions matters as much as a working MVP.

  • Exercises plus capstone project rubric

Evaluation focuses on observable engineering evidence. Exact rubrics are published per program when approved.

  • 01

    Main workflow correctness

    Does the primary user journey work as specified?

  • 02

    Code comprehension

    Can the participant explain what the code does and why?

  • 03

    Architecture explanation

    Are component boundaries and trade-offs articulated clearly?

  • 04

    Input validation

    Are invalid inputs rejected or handled safely?

  • 05

    Testing

    Are expected behavior and at least one failure mode checked?

  • 06

    Edge-case handling

    Does the work account for realistic non-happy-path conditions?

  • 07

    Documentation

    Can another engineer set up, run, and understand the MVP?

  • 08

    Demonstration

    Is the working result shown with an honest account of limitations?

Frequently asked questions

Vasiva Academy

Ready to build something real?

Choose a pathway, review a program, and register interest when enrollment opens.

Register interestInternshipsTraining